Democracy in District 5 - ID #13863
District 1 for the Columbia - ID #13864.
Friends of Ann - ID #10227
Question: Contributions to or from V.O.C.A.(Victims of Criminal Acts) and C.A.S.A.(Court Appointed Special Advocate)? On this issue, is it appropriate or legal in Oregon (These are 12/2007 Transactions as Cash Expenditures/Contributions)
Question: $700 in contributions from Pacific Northwest Regional Council of Carpenters, S.S.F. a Construction Trades Union, I think already commited to texas based energy speculator, Northern Star Natural Gas on the construction phase of the proposed Bradwood Landing LNG Terminal? Is that legal, ethical or conflicting? (Transaction as a Contribution of 02/05/2008 and showing up 08/03/2009?)
589827 07/31/2009 Amended Taxpayers Association of Oregon PAC (3889) Friends of Ann (10227
Cash Expenditure
$150.00
Friends of Jeff - #13869
(This Transaction is not on Hazen's Campaign Finance Activity to date 08-09-2009 and leads to the question "When are you going to report this and other activity Jeff?)589828 07/31/2009 Amended Taxpayers Association of Oregon PAC (3889) Friends of Jeff (13869)
Cash Expenditure
$150.00
Go To ORESTAR Search Page, Type In Committee ID# and hit "Submit" key
Showing posts with label Recall. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Recall. Show all posts
Monday, August 03, 2009
Sunday, July 26, 2009
Clatsop County Commissioner Jeff Hazen States His Position On Recall Effort Against Him
Saturday, July 25, 2009
Recall
Tuesday morning, recall petitions were filed against both Ann Samuelson and me.
I learned about it after receiving a call from a local reporter. I wasn't surprised that it happened since the chants of "Recall, Recall, Recall" were heard at our July 16th meeting......
Read Statement
Recall
Tuesday morning, recall petitions were filed against both Ann Samuelson and me.
I learned about it after receiving a call from a local reporter. I wasn't surprised that it happened since the chants of "Recall, Recall, Recall" were heard at our July 16th meeting......
Read Statement
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
Tuesday, February 26, 2008
Clatsop County Commissioner Samuelson Clarifies Her Position On Jewell Recall Petition
From: North Coast Oregon
Tryan,
So here’s proof that recall petitions do not have to state what is true and still be done in the state of Oregon.
Agencies such as Government Standards and Practices and others can be used for the sole purpose of harassing elected officials that make a decision somebody doesn’t like. You could literally put on a recall petition that you didn’t like my hair color and circulate it.
The truth becomes irrelevant and meaningless. I was not at this meeting due to a family member being in an emergency room in a Portland hospital and I had to be there.
Even though I wasn’t present I am presumed guilty by this group, and the local newspaper. According to OSBA no laws were broken at the meeting.
I received the letter from the five past board members by certified mail, threatening me with a lawsuit and recall effort if we did not meet their demand to have a meeting by Feb. 15th and recind the motion.
Again, just another bullying tactic, I’m pretty much used to it at this point since the money laundering accusation, made front page.
Mr. Taylor refused my certified letter demanding a retraction. I wish we could get half this much enthusiasm for a girls state playoff game in Jewell.
Tryan,
So here’s proof that recall petitions do not have to state what is true and still be done in the state of Oregon.
Agencies such as Government Standards and Practices and others can be used for the sole purpose of harassing elected officials that make a decision somebody doesn’t like. You could literally put on a recall petition that you didn’t like my hair color and circulate it.
The truth becomes irrelevant and meaningless. I was not at this meeting due to a family member being in an emergency room in a Portland hospital and I had to be there.
Even though I wasn’t present I am presumed guilty by this group, and the local newspaper. According to OSBA no laws were broken at the meeting.
I received the letter from the five past board members by certified mail, threatening me with a lawsuit and recall effort if we did not meet their demand to have a meeting by Feb. 15th and recind the motion.
Again, just another bullying tactic, I’m pretty much used to it at this point since the money laundering accusation, made front page.
Mr. Taylor refused my certified letter demanding a retraction. I wish we could get half this much enthusiasm for a girls state playoff game in Jewell.
Monday, February 25, 2008
Richard Lee: $8000 To Finance His Own Anti-Recall Campaign?
Update 02-26-2008: Anybody from District 3 been contacted by a phone survey the last few days on the Lee Recall?
Survey Questions Asked:
"First question: If you were to vote today would you vote to recall County Commissioner Richard Lee?"
"Second Question: If you knew the recall was being run by individuals with a grudge Mr. Lee and the information was false and manufactured would you change your vote?"
This from an email:
"Now, I read Mr. Lee's wife has inserted a fresh $8,000.00 plus an unnamed, aditional $175.00 into a new Anti-Recall Campaign filed with the Oregon State's Elections Division.
I thought Mr. Lee insisted that he is guilty of nothing and his socalled "Silent Majority" of supporters in Commission District #3 were behind him all the way and would support him to the end.
If that is so, why would any of this effort be necessary and doesn't it, in some sense, infer guilt on his part to react in this manner?"
Do not publish my email address - please
Survey Questions Asked:
"First question: If you were to vote today would you vote to recall County Commissioner Richard Lee?"
"Second Question: If you knew the recall was being run by individuals with a grudge Mr. Lee and the information was false and manufactured would you change your vote?"
This from an email:
"Now, I read Mr. Lee's wife has inserted a fresh $8,000.00 plus an unnamed, aditional $175.00 into a new Anti-Recall Campaign filed with the Oregon State's Elections Division.
I thought Mr. Lee insisted that he is guilty of nothing and his socalled "Silent Majority" of supporters in Commission District #3 were behind him all the way and would support him to the end.
If that is so, why would any of this effort be necessary and doesn't it, in some sense, infer guilt on his part to react in this manner?"
Do not publish my email address - please
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)