Tuesday, November 13, 2007

1000 Friends of Oregon LNG Pipeline and Terminal Position Statement

1000 Friends of Oregon LNG Pipeline and Terminal Position Statement
Liquefied Natural Gas pipelines and terminals threaten livable urban and rural communities, family farms and forests, and natural and scenic areas across Oregon.
Oregon faces an unprecedented number of proposals for Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) import terminals, pipelines, and related facilities. Two terminals are currently proposed for the Columbia River Estuary, and a third terminal is proposed for Coos Bay. Hundreds of miles of pipeline are proposed from the Columbia River terminals to Molalla, from Central Oregon to Molalla, and from Coos Bay to the California border. These pipelines would cut across hundreds of miles of productive farm and forest land to serve utilities in California, where the vast majority of the gas from the three terminals would be used.
1000 Friends of Oregon is opposed to these proposals because the pipelines threaten family farms and forests and the terminals threaten sensitive estuaries and the fisheries that depend on them. Oregon and the Pacific Northwest are already feeling the effects of global warming. Constructing huge facilities to import fossil fuels will worsen these effects and undercut our goals for energy independence.
If the LNG facilities are built, they should be built on Oregon’s terms. The pipelines should follow existing roads and rights-of-way, instead of plowing through the middle of productive farm fields and forest lands that support Oregon families. The terminals should fully comply with Oregon’s Statewide Planning Goals without exceptions, including Goal 16, which protects Estuarine Resources.
In the words of 1000 Friends co-founder, Governor Tom McCall:
"Oregon is demure and lovely, and ought to play a little hard to get. And I think you’ll all be just as sick as I am if you find it is nothing but a hungry hussy, throwing herself at every stinking smokestack that’s offered."

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

I listened to Lars today. He is pro LNG and so unfair and unbalanced in his interviews. I've also picked up on his campaign to remove Kulongowski. He swiftly got that Cnn guy involved in the Gabriel Case. There are no winners in that situation, as Gabriel Allred's father says, but I disagree. Lars wins.

lee R

Patrick McGee said...

I would have loved to have heard that one.

I'll bet his position on LNG is word for word off the LNG Sepculator B.S. sheet and I would love for somebody to call in and challenge his overbearing ass before he cuts them off.

You're nominated and make his life a living hell!!

I hope reason prevails on the Allred kid. Coomon sense has got to prevail. The only parents and life that kid knows are his foster parents.

Anonymous said...

If I knew more about the psychological history of his father and felt the boy was safe with his grandma, I think they should just consider visitations to the grandmother over a long period of time so he could have more people in his life that love him.

Of course it may just make things more complicated for everyone. Grandparents as just grandparents can be a very good thing.

Lee

Anonymous said...

Hey, me, make someone's life a living hell? I don't do that. Trust me.

lee