Below are the to-date results of our existing poll asking if you support the recall of Clatsop County Commissioners Jeff Hazen And Ann Samuelson.
We are reformatting this poll for individual input for each Commissioner
Yes To Remove Hazen 57 (79%)
No To Remove Hazen 17 (23%)
Yes To Remove Samuelson 66 (91%)
No To Remove Samuelson 5 (6%)
Change your vote
Votes so far: 72
Days left to vote: 24
21 comments:
According to the blog from KLNG the city of Warrenton should ban all people not in lock step with our Dear Leaders, Ann and Jeff.
Bring the County Commission's politics of exclusion to your neighborhood.
Looking forward to finding out how much of of our money these public servants have been spending.
I think Freel just does what he's told to do according to NNB's agenda as his history seems to reflect.
Never know where his "flip" will "flop" but, yes, suggesting Gil Gramson go kick petition gatherers off City of Warrenton property is a bit much don't you think?
I was a little surprised at his blaming the U.S. Weather Service for the weather not being to his liking also.
I've learned the best way to plan for the weather here on the coast is to just look out your window and never trust coastal weather forecasting coming out of Portland.
Good going Tom Freel and KLNG!
Why stop at just selling out to fossil fuel speculaters.
Go that extra mile and make sure you lobby a bunch of town gobs to stifel the rights of those that don't agree with ya and especially on property that's paid for by maybe some of those petition name collecter's taxes.
Good move Tom Freel.
They got every right to be there as long as they obey the laws they are supposed to.
So, Mr. McGee, you write in Tom Freel's blog that both his and your polls are bogus and corruptable as well as all get out and are totally worthless, but you continue yours as if it was legitimate. Do you not consider this unethical and dishonest or do you not care? Or, perhaps you think the people in the community or actually that stupid, despite your disclamers?
Look at my polls "Anonym 1:06PM".
The stats on my poll are right there in front of you.
Now, do you see runaway and totally unbelieveable numbers?
Notice I'm not quoting this as factual information and you see the same tallies as I do so.
Would you use the data in either poll as factual information?
Mr. McGee
Yes, actually, the numbers in your polls do not seem righous. In addition the numbers in your poll for Port Commissioner, listing yourself as a write in, were surely bogus. But the question is, if you are an ethical person who should be given attention, why did you write to Freel that both his and your polls were bogus and worthless and then keep polling?
Righous?
And what would "Righous" mean?
Righteous Maybe?
My poll numbers are what they are with no tampering, Port Commisioner elections are over, ethics?, Attention? Who are you to ask or determine that? Freel's Polls, in my view, bogus as they come.
Wow, Mr. McGee, I'm impressed that you are so slick. You responded without answering the question, provided critical comments on spelling and changed the subject. Perhaps your goal of being elected to something should be realized, but in Mexico where your style would be more appreciated.
Awww! Anonym 12:32PM, you wanta engage in an inane pissing match do you?
Not going to happen.
You want to discuss the merits of corruptable polls and how simply they can be overidden to vote as often as you wish?
Polls with no stats whatsoever and pimped as factual, concise citizen input?
Polls that can be manipulated by being able to adjust the numbers to suit your agenda?
Ask KAST's Tom Freel, he should be able to tell you excatly how that works.
Mr. McGee,
Still you don't answer the question. It was: why did you write to Tom Freel that your polls and his were bogus, corruptable and worthless? Now you say on your own website that your polls are what they are with no tampering. How can your polls be bogus and yet not tampered with? And since they are bogus by your own words, why do you keep doing them? I can understand that you will not answer this question, but I thought you should get a third chance to try.
Because they are Anonym 2:12PM
Because they are, they can be but, I choose not to.
Because I feel like doing it for the benefit of those that choose to check the pulse on an issue by straw poll.
Ah well, Mr. McGee, that is a honest answer, in a manner of speaking. You do bogus polls on your website because you can. Interesting ethics, but you obviously do not bother with those kind of things.
Ethics?
Yours or mine more appropriately regarding polls.
See the polls on the left on this site.
Do you clearly understand each question?
When you vote your vote shows up and you see the current tally and percentages right?
Now, is there something missing on these polls that you question?
Is there something on these polls, in the overall context that you do not understand or more likely, comprehend?
Ethically, I think I've made these polls as clear and fair as possible, even though they can still be tampered with but, I do not choose to do so and in the end are the result of any value?
Not really but, both Samueslon, Hazen and LNG development are getting their asses kicked on this site.
Go figure.
So, why did you tell Tom Freel that your polls were bogus and worthless? Was that a lie?
It no lie, Anonym - 7:45PM that Freel's poll, like mine is corruptable and of no statistical value whatsoever hence, what is called a "Straw Poll" and you know, if you still cannot grasp that concept, you really need to go to another subject much less complex than this one obviously is for you.
Ah, McGee, you silver tongued devil. Obviously, you have learned that being nasty to your readers is a good way to quell questions you don't want to answer. But, you still have not answered the question about your statement to Tom Freel. Are you this way at home?
We're done with this Anonym 11:26AM
Now,now Patrick, if you don't want people to comment on the information you present, or on your attitude in dealing with those who do not subscribe to your thoughts or presentation methods, perhaps you should: get a thicker skin; be subscription only for those who foolishly and blindly follow your lead; or get off the Internet. If you really want to gain elected office, you certainly must get a thicker skin. Being rude, nasty and evil to people who disagree with you is not a good trait for an elected official. And, you never did answer that guy's question.
Patrick, what, no quick and nasty reply? Are you on vacation or could someone have caught you in a lie? If the latter is true, it's no wonder you stay mute as your kind talks a lot but never raises its hand and takes responsibilty for the results of its work. Enlightening, but what a shame.
Wow, what a difference between Grass Roots poll and KAST's poll. In fact, the difference between the polls are so great that after the election we will know who's poll is fraud and who's isn't. Anyone want to bet on who's poll is bogus?
So McGee, you are obviously going to let this string go away without commenting on the accusations that you lied to Tom Freel. Your inability or unwillingness to answer shows the accusations against you are accurate. That you lied will not be forgotten!
Post a Comment